ISO 9001 Quality · ISO 14001 Environmental · ISO 27001 Information Security

Rebuilding evidence
for every certification audit?

PAASUP ACE turns the work you're already doing — approvals, documents, training, meetings — directly into audit evidence. No more building separate documents just for certification.

This is the same system PAASUP runs its own quality, environmental and security operations on.

The problem isn't a lack of documents —
it's that documents live apart from the work.

01

Evidence collection starts right before the audit

Scrambling to gather meeting minutes, training records and review history at the last minute means you can't even prove the work actually happened. What wasn't recorded didn't happen, as far as the auditor is concerned.

02

Everything depends on one person

When only one person knows where the documents are and which version is current, the system stalls the year that person is out. Certification has to live in the system, not in a person.

03

Documents that stop the moment the audit ends

Documents made only for certification sit apart from real work, so nobody opens them again. The next audit starts the same collection work from zero.

We don't create evidence.
The work becomes the evidence.

Leave approvals, document revisions, training completion and management review meetings are work you'd do regardless of certification. When those records stay linked to the relevant clause of the standard, preparing for an audit stops being a scramble to collect material — it becomes showing what's already there.

How everyday work accumulates into audit evidence Records from e-approvals, document management, training management and management review meetings accumulate in the system as audit evidence: document revision history, training and competency records, internal audit and management review records, and access-permission and view logs. Everyday work E-approvals —leave, travel, requests Document mgmt —revisions, reviews Training —completion, competency Meetings —management review, audits Records linked to clauses Audit evidence Document revision history Training & competency records Internal audit & review records Access & view logs
There's no separate "evidence screen." It's the same data, viewed from another angle.

Quality, environmental and security don't need three separate tools.

Procedures the three standards require in common — training, documentation, internal audit, management review, nonconformity action — run once. Only what differs by standard is managed separately.

ISO 9001

Quality

  • 6.1Risk & opportunity register
  • 6.2Quality objectives
  • 7.2Competency & training
  • 7.5Documented information
  • 8.4Supplier evaluation
  • 9.2Internal audit
  • 9.3Management review
  • 10.2Nonconformity & corrective action (CAPA)
ISO 14001

Environmental

  • 6.1.3Compliance obligations register
  • 6.2Environmental objectives
  • 7.2Competency & training
  • 7.5Documented information
  • 8.2Emergency preparedness & drills
  • 9.2Internal audit
  • 9.3Management review
  • 10.2Nonconformity & corrective action (CAPA)
ISO 27001

Information Security

  • 6.1.2Risk assessment — asset × threat matrix
  • 6.1.3Risk treatment plan & SoA
  • 7.2Security awareness & training
  • A.5.18Access grant/revocation history
  • A.6.5Employment status change history
  • A.8.15Login & audit logs
  • A.8.16Document view/download logs
  • 9.2Internal audit
  • 9.3Management review
  • 10.1Nonconformity & corrective action (CAPA)

The system doesn't replace every requirement of the standards. Procedures that require judgment outside the system — context-of-the-organization and stakeholder analysis, or environmental aspect/impact assessment, for example — still need to be carried out separately. Talk to us and we'll map out which procedures move into the system and which stay outside it.

"Did that actually happen?"
Answered on screen.

Access grant/revocation history

Every document, register and feature permission keeps both when it was granted and when it was revoked. You can answer, with a record, exactly when a departed employee's access was cut off.

Document view/download logs

Who opened or downloaded which document, and when, is recorded. Access control is proven by an actual log, not just a written policy.

Git-based document history

Document management runs on a self-hosted git repository as the source of truth. Revision history lives in commits — who changed what, and when, can't be edited away after the fact.

Employment status change history

Hires, departures and personnel changes stay on record, forming the basis for access revocation and training-scope decisions.

We don't start with a company-wide rollout.

  1. 1

    Register your org chart and staff

    Setting up departments and reporting lines defines approval routing, training scope and permission scope together. Sign in with your Google Workspace account.

  2. 2

    Connect your document repository

    Upload the documents you already use into the repository. From then on, every revision keeps a history.

  3. 3

    Turn on registers, standard by standard

    Start with the registers (risk, compliance, training, audits, management review) for the standard you're preparing for. Add the rest when you need them.

We'll map out what you can use as-is
from your current setup, and reply.

Tell us your organization's size, which standard you're preparing for, and where your documents currently live — we'll review the scope and order of rollout and get back to you.

  • Standard(s) you're preparing for (9001 · 14001 · 27001) and expected audit timing
  • How you currently manage documents and records
  • Team size and the account environment you use